Ever since Donald Trump first took the
lead in the GOP primary polls last summer, and especially since winning his
first primary in New Hampshire in February, his supporters have been shouting
that he has an absolute mandate from the voters, and that all Republicans who
refuse to bow to Trump are defying the “will of the people”. “The people” is a
little nebulous, but let’s take that to mean that Trump’s impending nomination
is the will of the Republican electorate. Is that true?
Let’s start by looking at the overall
vote totals for each Republican nominee during the primary, from 1976 through
the present contest (the 1976 election was the first Republican primary in
which all fifty states held direct elections, and there was a heavily contested
primary race).
Year:
|
Nominee:
|
Vote
Percentage:
|
Vote
Total:
|
1976
|
Gerald Ford
|
53.3%
|
5.53 million
|
1980
|
Ronald Reagan
|
59.8%
|
7.71 million
|
1984
|
Ronald Reagan
|
98.8%
|
6.45 million
|
1988
|
George H. W. Bush
|
67.9%
|
8.25 million
|
1992
|
George H. W. Bush
|
72.9%
|
9.19 million
|
1996
|
Bob Dole
|
58.8%
|
9.02 million
|
2000
|
George W. Bush
|
62.0%
|
12.03 million
|
2004
|
George W. Bush
|
98.1%
|
7.85 million
|
2008
|
John McCain
|
46.7%
|
9.90 million
|
2012
|
Mitt Romney
|
52.1%
|
10.03 million
|
2016
|
Donald Trump
|
44.2%
|
13.45 million
|
So from this comparison, we can see that
Trump has narrowly received more votes in the primary than any other nominee in
the history of the Republican Party, as his supporters like to brag. Not by
much, and the general trend of vote totals for nominees since 1976 shows a
gradual increase, presumably due to population growth and other factors, but
the accomplishment is still noteworthy.
What also has to be pointed out,
however, is that Trump’s percentage of the popular vote is also the lowest of
any nominee since 1976—only John McCain in 2008 previously failed to win an
absolute majority of votes. Let’s follow this result with another comparison,
this time adding together the total number of votes cast in Republican
primaries for major candidates other than the eventual
nominee. For example, the vote percentage and total given for 1976 will match
the number of votes won by Ronald Reagan, as he and eventual nominee Gerald
Ford were the only two seriously contesting the nomination that year; however,
the figures for 1980 add together the primary votes won by George H. W. Bush
and John Anderson. (There were no major primary challenges to incumbent
presidents Reagan and Bush in 1984 and 2004, respectively.)
Year:
|
Major
Candidates (Apart from the Nominee):
|
Vote
Percentage:
|
Vote
Total:
|
1976
|
Reagan
|
45.9%
|
4.76 million
|
1980
|
Bush; Anderson
|
36.0%
|
4.64 million
|
1984
|
Uncontested
|
---
|
---
|
1988
|
Dole; Robertson
|
28.2%
|
3.43 million
|
1992
|
Buchanan
|
23.0%
|
2.90 million
|
1996
|
Buchanan; Forbes
|
32.2%
|
4.94 million
|
2000
|
McCain; Keyes
|
36.3%
|
7.05 million
|
2004
|
Uncontested
|
---
|
---
|
2008
|
Huckabee; Romney; Paul
|
47.9%
|
10.14 million
|
2012
|
Santorum; Gingrich; Paul
|
45.5%
|
8.76 million
|
2016
|
Cruz; Rubio; Kasich
|
50.8%
|
15.44 million
|
As the second chart shows, Trump may
have narrowly won more popular votes than any other Republican nominee in
history—but he also saw far more votes against
him than against any other nominee in history. Every nominee faces some degree
of resistance from certain segments of the party, but the number of serious
resistance votes cast against Trump, with state primaries remaining close
through May, demonstrates the unprecedented scale of the pushback—not only from
party elites and activists, but by millions of ordinary voters.
Tomorrow I'll look at some of those individual state results in more detail, as well as draw some final conclusions from Trump's overall primary showing.
No comments:
Post a Comment