How else to explain the success of
Donald Trump, now the party’s presumptive nominee, which by extension signifies
the abandonment of many principles and policy ideals which many believed Reagan
had in effect made mandatory for GOP presidential nominees. An ironclad
commitment to pro-life values; a strong and outward-looking foreign policy; a
dedication to cutting spending and the size of government, and pursuing
meaningful entitlement reform—all these and more Trump has either abandoned
since clinching the nomination or never claimed to support in the first place.
And, judging by his success, a plurality
of primary voters hold no meaningful commitment to these issues either. Voters
were given a clear contrast in Ted Cruz, the embodiment of virtually every
Reaganite principle across the board, and more chose the man who ridiculed a
female opponent’s looks and engaged in 9/11 trutherism.
Some of Trump’s most ardent Republican
defenders attempt to draw parallels between him and Reagan, such as both men’s
distrust of the party establishment and pre-political careers on television.
But where Reagan was private and thoughtful, Trump is loud, careless, and conceited,
to say the least. While touring GE plants as part of his GE Theater hosting contract, Reagan would spend time discussing
important policy issues and the virtues of limited government. On The Apprentice, Trump would say of a
female contestant, “[It] must be a pretty picture, you dropping to your knees,”
and discussed having a season in which teams would be segregated by skin color.
Can you imagine Reagan standing on the stage of a televised presidential debate
discussing penis sizes?
Reagan would have been mortified and
embarrassed for his party by the antics of its current standard-bearer. But
many of the voters of 2016 would have sided with Trump against Reagan, because
a plurality just sided against the man who is essentially Reagan’s ideological
twin.
No comments:
Post a Comment