Thursday, October 20, 2016

Thoughts on the Final Debate


The third and final presidential debate was much like the first two—contentious and bitter, with Clinton being her typical robotic self (“I’m a real person!”) and Trump being Trump. One welcome change was the moderator. Chris Wallace may well be the first moderator of a presidential debate not to be widely condemned afterward by one side or the other. He asked hard-hitting, substantive questions of both candidates, and was the model of the tough-but-fair journalist that have become all too rare in general election debates.

And there the differences with prior debates end. Madame Robot came out ahead of Trump, mainly due to the latter’s slide during the final half. Trump has noticeably improved his performance since the first general debate last month, and especially since the early primary season debates, but he still reverts to form the longer he’s on stage. The interruptions become more frequent and blustery; the outlandish statements begin to flow more easily.

If there was one defining moment of this phenomenon, and of the debate as a whole, it came when Trump refused, repeatedly, to guarantee that he would accept the outcome of the election. “I’ll keep you in suspense,” were his final words on the subject. Democrats’ indignant claims that to question the outcome of an election is unprecedented ring hollow—Florida, 2000, anyone?—but with that one response, Trump did more damage to himself with independent voters than the Clinton campaign could hope to achieve. As always, Trump  came through for Clinton in the end.

Overall, there was no game-changer once again. Clinton probably won narrowly. And Trump did nothing to prevent himself from suffering a humiliating defeat in three weeks.



No comments:

Post a Comment