Forty-six days before Election Day,
presidential election voting has officially begun. Starting today, voters in
Minnesota, South Dakota, and Vermont will be able to vote in-person at local
election offices. (Several other states have already begun mailing absentee
ballots.) From now on, a few more states will begin early voting every week,
until two-thirds of the country will have begun voting by the last week in
October. Some election analysts have estimated that at least 40% of voters will
cast ballots before Election Day.
Meanwhile, Monday will see the first of
three scheduled presidential debates.
There are many valid arguments for and
against early voting, but one serious drawback few people discuss is that it
essentially locks in a vote over a month before Election Day—this year, before
three presidential debates, one vice-presidential debate, and who knows how
many scandals and breaking news stories, any of which could affect a voter’s
decision on whom to support.
One of the best and most recent
illustrations of the dangers of early voting can be seen in the results of the
Arizona GOP presidential primary. Marco Rubio, following his disastrous finish
in the Florida primary on March 15, dropped out of the presidential race. But
even though Arizona’s primary was held a week later, on March 22, because of
early voting (which had started a month beforehand), Rubio still managed to
earn just over 13% of the vote, or over 70,000 votes—not enough to change the
overall results, but still a significant number of people who would presumably
have rather voted for a candidate still in the race.
I’ve known for months exactly who I
intend to vote for in this election, and at this point I can’t imagine anything
changing my mind. But I’ll wait to cast my ballot until November 8,
because—especially in this election—you never know what could happen, to change
the calculus in an instant.
No comments:
Post a Comment