Wednesday, September 7, 2016

November Outlook (Part 1): The House


The end of Labor Day marks the traditional beginning of general election campaigning—news to anyone who’s been watching the campaign dominate the daily headlines for months. Still, with state-level primaries nearly complete and two months until Election Day, now is as good a time as any to look at where the races for governor, Senate, and House of Representatives stand—races that get far less media attention, but are just as important as the presidential election in shaping the next four years. Today I’ll give an overview of the House elections, with installments on the Senate, as well as this year’s twelve gubernatorial races, coming later this week.

The short version: Regardless of who wins the presidency, Republicans (as of now) look likely to keep the House, but this has not been a good year for conservatives, anywhere on the ballot. Just two non-incumbents with widespread conservative backing, Jim Banks in Indiana’s Third District and Warren Davidson in Ohio’s Eight District, won their primaries. Davidson’s victory in a special election was particularly sweet, as he now holds John Boehner’s old seat and upon taking office promptly joined the Freedom Caucus, the group largely responsible for Boehner’s resignation.

Still, solid conservative challengers lost primaries for House seats in Florida and Georgia, and Tim Huelskamp, a solid conservative incumbent, lost his primary to an establishment-backed challenger. Meanwhile, several other principled incumbents, most notably Rod Blum in Iowa’s First, face difficult general elections.

The more comforting news is that many other conservative congressmen look all but assured of winning another term, including the vast majority of Freedom Caucus members. The most likely scenario (again, as of right now) is basically a status quo election in the House, with Republicans retaining control, although probably losing a few states from an historically large majority, and the number of conservative members holding steady. Of course if Trump begins tanking even more, that outlook could quickly sour.

The major disappointment for 2016, then, isn’t so much a dramatic loss in the number of seats held by either Republicans or tried-and-true conservatives, as much as it is a failure to live up to expectations. This was supposed to be the year when a large batch of energetic new Congressional recruits would join forces with a constitutional conservative presidential ticket to shake up Washington. Keeping the status quo for another two years is by no means the worst possible outcome, but it—coupled with the loss of Rep. Huelskamp—is yet another disappointment in a year already full of them.



No comments:

Post a Comment