Unlike many other Trump critics during
the 2016 primary and general election seasons, I was never opposed in principle
to the idea of a wall along the southern border. Trump’s presentation of the
idea was ridiculous, to be sure, as was his suggestion that Mexico would pay
for it. But the concept of a wall itself was a good one, for both practical and
psychological reasons. There can be no doubt that the border was far from
secure during Barack Obama’s tenure in the White House, and though things have
improved somewhat since then, much work remains.
But Trump’s spotty record of keeping his
promises and staying consistent on the issues, from his professional life to
his public political statements, made it seem at the time that his pledge to
build a wall would likely be quickly forgotten, should he ever achieve the
presidency. There was no evidence that Trump, beneath all his bluster, had the
ability to fight both the Democrats and the bipartisan caucus of
limitless-immigration advocates in Washington, to the point necessary to change
the border situation to any meaningful degree.
That situation has improved,
to be sure, more than we had reason to hope. But that improvement is only
temporary, unless the Trump administration can find a way to make a
large-scale, tangible, and permanent change at the southern border. Something
big and beautiful, maybe.
The wall seems to have faded in priority
within the Trump administration. Aside from it being politically stupid for the
administration to let such a major campaign promise go unfulfilled, it would be
a border enforcement measure that future administrations would find next to
impossible to reverse. It needn’t stretch along the entire border, either—just
an added, highly visible security measure along the most troublesome portions.
But it would send a clear message to all those who seek to enter the country
illegally: America is a country of law and order.
No comments:
Post a Comment