Norma McCorvey, better known as Jane
Roe—the plaintiff in Roe v. Wade—died over the weekend.
As the obituary at the link notes, she
was a complicated woman—accidental architect of one of the most consequential
Supreme Court decisions of the past century, and eventually one of its fiercest
opponents. In 2005, she petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn Roe, on the primary basis that she, the
plaintiff in the original case, regretted her part in the decision. Obviously,
the Court declined.
Many believed her conversion to be less
about true conviction than an attempt to capitalize on fame. Obviously, no one
can know what her true intentions actually were, why she eventually abandoned
and took up rhetorical arms against the cause that still considers her to be
something of a patron saint. But her actions following her joining of the
pro-life cause seemed sincere, if ineffective as tactics. Those, in the end,
are all we can judge. Perhaps she acted so rashly, in picketing judicial
confirmation hearings, out of a sense of guilt for what she had helped wrought.
Or perhaps she was simply seeking attention.
Finally, one cannot help but wonder what
became of the child that McCorvey bore only months before the Roe decision was handed down. Her
pregnancy with that child, her desire to terminate that pregnancy, was what led
the Court to consider the constitutionality of state abortion restrictions in
the first place. It seems safe to assume that McCorvey never had any further
interaction with, or knowledge of, the child she gave up for adoption. That
individual presumably has no knowledge of the complicated role they have played
in American history.
McCorvey, of course, did know. She might
not have a famous name, and her death will get little coverage in a media
obsessed with Donald Trump. But her legacy continues to have a deep and
consequential impact on American life.
RIP.
No comments:
Post a Comment